PLEASE NOTE: from 03/01/2026, the certification exam will no longer be held at the end of the session, but remotely and off-line, on the date of your choice (voucher valid for 1 year).
INTER
IN-HOUSE
CUSTOM
Practical course in person or remote class
Available in English on request
PLEASE NOTE: from 03/01/2026, the certification exam will no longer be held at the end of the session, but remotely and off-line, on the date of your choice (voucher valid for 1 year).
The certification exam is included in the training. Obtaining international ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) certification makes it possible to demonstrate acquisition of a level of knowledge and skill in testing software for lead contractors and project owners. Training followed by official certification by the ISTQB.
Hands-on work during days 2 and 3. Continuous exam preparation (~100 questions). Mock exam and correction with comments on the 3rd day.
Teaching methods
Description of concepts, hands-on exercises, and preparing for the test.
Course schedule
1
Fundamentals of Testing
Why is testing necessary.
What is testing?
General testing principles.
Fundamental test process.
The psychology of testing.
2
Testing throughout the life cycle
Software development models.
Test levels.
Test types: the targets of testing.
Maintenance testing.
3
Static techniques
Reviews and test process.
Review process.
Static analysis by Tools.
4
Test design techniques
Test conditions and designing test cases.
Categories of test design techniques.
Specification-based or black-box techniques.
Structure-based or white-box techniques.
Experience-based techniques.
Choosing test techniques.
5
Test management
Test organisation.
Test planning and estimation.
Progress monitoring and control.
Configuration management.
Risk and testing.
Incident management.
6
Tool support for testing
Types of test Tools.
Effective use of tools: potential benefits and risks.
Introducing a tool into an organization.
7
Exam
Mock examination.
Official ISTQB examination.
Customer reviews
4 / 5
Customer reviews are based on end-of-course evaluations. The score is calculated from all evaluations within the past year. Only reviews with a textual comment are displayed. (Translated by Deepl)
MERIEM B.
17/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenu est bien structuré, clair et bien expliqué et illustré Le contenu reste très danse : beaucoup d’infos qui nécessitent plus de temps pour voir différents contextes.
BASTIEN B.
17/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenue et la pédagogie est bien
CHANDRAN P.
17/12/25
4 / 5
Contenu dense, une journée en plus pour assimiler serait mieux
DAMIEN N.
17/12/25
4 / 5
Beaucoup de contenu pour peu de temps. Ca va un peu vite. Pas assez d’exercice du au manque de temps.
ANAS L.
17/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenu de la formation est trop chargé pour 3 jourset on devrait avoir plus de temps avant de passer l’examen de la certification et non pas directement après la formation
.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Jonathan applique une approche très pédagogique pour le cours. Il arrive à simplifier les éléments complexes présents dans le support de cours. Le cours est très dynamique vivant et interactif. Jonathan a su adapter son langage et niveau d’explication à chaque membre du groupe, bien que les profils soient variés !Cependant, le format de 3j est très chargé et laisse peu de temps pour assimiler et mettre en pratique les notions abordées.
CLAUDE R.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Le formateur a été très agréable pendant la formation. Il a su rebondir sur nos questions, craintes et problématiques de compréhension et s’adapter à nous. Merci à lui.
OLIVIER D.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Formateur très pédagogue et à l écoute des stagiaires
RIM B.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Super formateur
THIBAULT M.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Pas assez de temps pour permettre de faire des cas pratiques
ETIENNE E.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Très bien
YASSINE B.
15/12/25
5 / 5
BIEN RESUME BONNE PEDAGOGIE
BRYAN G.
10/12/25
5 / 5
Excellent
MARY M.
10/12/25
4 / 5
RAS
REGINE Z.
10/12/25
4 / 5
Très bien
CAMILLE B.
09/12/25
5 / 5
Dynamique et ludique, très pédagogue.
LAURE D.
09/12/25
4 / 5
Très bien mais dense.Parfois pas assez de temps de s’imprégner des notions.Debit d’information/parole parfois trop rapide
NICOLAS C.
09/12/25
5 / 5
Très bon formateurexplique très bien et beaucoup d’humourje recommande !
FREDERIC M.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenu du stage est bien mais l’équilibre des 3 jours est complétement raté. Le premier jour devrait être beaucoup plus intense et entrer dans le vif du sujet directement plutôt que parcourir un sommaire de ce qu’on doit traiter les jours 2 et 3.
VANESSA E.
08/12/25
3 / 5
- manque de cas concrets et d’exemples pour se projeter dans un cotexte et mieux mémoriser et comprendre les sujets- il comporte des quelques erreurs et nécessite des mises à jour- pour les quizz et questions posés dommage de ne pas utiliser un outil ou module plus dynamique qui permettrait de mieux saisir nos réponses (pas du tout pratique dans Teams quand plusieurs choix et réponses possibles), cela impliquerait aussi davantage les participants qui n’allument pas leur caméra
QUOC HUY V.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Tres bien
INTRONO FAVIER MARIE D.
08/12/25
3 / 5
Rythme de la formation digne d’une année de PACES
SYLVIE C.
08/12/25
3 / 5
Cette formation ressemble plus à de l’intellectualisation du métier de testeur qu’à une formation sur en tant que telle. Elle s’attarde aussi beaucoup sur la méthode Agile qui, même si elle a un lien avec les tests, ne devrait pas faire partie d’une certification sur le test. Cela m’a plus confusionnée qu’autre chose.
LOBNA J.
08/12/25
3 / 5
Manque des cas concrets
CARMEN B.
08/12/25
4 / 5
C’est un peu bourrage de crâne. Il manque 1 jour au moins dans la prépa
FLORIAN B.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Je trouve personnellement que 3 jours sont trop court pour voir l’ensemble des documents nécéssaires : glossaire , syllabus , cours.Sachant que les questions de l’examen sont souvent confuses, je l’admet peut etre par manque de vocabulaire, ou demandent de connaitre "par coeur" des définitions du glossaire.Je pense que les questions de l’examen ne sont pas assez accessibles.
LEO G.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Manque de cas pratiques et peu d’effort sur la vulgarisation des termes complexes et du jargon.
CÉCILE L.
08/12/25
3 / 5
Beaucoup de théorie, peu de pratiqueCertains sujets n’ont pas été assez approfondis
YANIS C.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Trop peu de temps certaines notions sont vue rapidement par manque de temps.
VIRGINIE P.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Les journées sont denses et les pauses nécessaires pour s’aérer l’esprit (10 minutes c’est peu à mon goût, j’aurais plutôt envisagé 15 minutes). Il y a eu beaucoup de présentations d’exemples concrets appréciés.Certains échanges informels sont allés un peu loin et ont pénalisé le temps d’explication et d’apprentissage sur ces sujets plus complexes.
EMMANUEL N.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Intensité du contenu,
RAPHAEL F.
08/12/25
4 / 5
J’aurai apprécié pour les quiz du cours utiliser un environnement dédié pour répondre sans être influencé par les réponses des autres.Utiliser le chat de teams était pratique, mais influençait trop dans les réponses données
HAMMADI J.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenu est trop dense et il n’y a pas assez de temps pour réviser entre les cours et le passage de la certification.
AMANDA P.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Good Content but because of the very tight schedule, it felt a bit rushed.
HOUSSEM E.
01/12/25
3 / 5
côté formation ça été top que ce soit contenu du support ou explications et relationnelle avec la formatrice.Le gros point négatif c’est que l’on est obligé de passer l’examen de la certification DIRECTEMENT à la fin de la formation. Déjà la formation est serrée (3 jrs) et en plus, on a pas de temps pour prendre du recul et revoir des choses, travailler plus d’examens et s’auto-évaluer pour pouvoir identifier les axes d’améliorations éventuels.
FABIEN T.
01/12/25
3 / 5
Contenu trop scolaire, trop de par coeur. Fond intéressant mais forme insatisfaisante. Exemples intéressants mais trop peu de cas pratiques.Contenu trop compact par manque de temps, formation trop rapide.
WAHIDI EL ALAOUI NADA E.
01/12/25
4 / 5
Formation très dense, ce qui aurait été mieux serait de la faire sur 4j puis passer la certification plus tard pour pouvoir assimiler les différentes notions de la formation.
SAHAR G.
01/12/25
4 / 5
Formation trop lourde en 2jours et demi. Possibilité de passer le certificat quelques jours après avoir fait la formation.
ALEXANDRE M.
01/12/25
4 / 5
Contenu trop dense pour une durée trop courte, il serait mieux (à mon avis) de faire plusieurs examens blanc le 3ème jour et faire l’examen (sur tablette de préférence) le 4ème jour au matin.
VALENTIN L.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Bon formateur, même si la gestion du temps à été un peu dépassé.
HÉLÈNE M.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Formatrice très pédagogue et dynamique, encore merci à elle.Formation très intéressante mais trop condensée, trop d’infos et pas assez de temps pour digérer avant l’examen
ANGE L.
24/11/25
5 / 5
J’estime que pour une formation à distance l’intervenante a su nous captiver et a su donner un ton qui nous donnait envie de suivre, d’interagir. Ceci n’est pas chose aisé d’autant plus de part la technicité de ce que nous devions ingérer comme information.
JEAN-PHILIPPE G.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Il faudrait pondérer en fonction du nombre de questions posées à l’exam, e.g passer beaucoup de temps chap 4 et 5
FRÉDÉRIC K.
24/11/25
4 / 5
3 jours est très court pour assimiler l’ensemble du contenu ISTQB Foundation qui est très dense.
MOHCINE B.
24/11/25
4 / 5
pas de temps allouer pour la partie pratique (à part le sujet A, nous avons pas eu le temps de traiter les autres sujets). Plus le lien entre ISTQB et le travail personnelle des testeurs.
LEA P.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Il y a beaucoup de choses à retenir et à assimiler en 3 jours
CHARLÈNE K.
24/11/25
5 / 5
J’aimerais remercier le formateur pour l’accompagnement durant la formation. Le présentiel m’a énormément aidée et les explications m’ont permis de progresser. Et j’ai obtenu mon examen ! Merci pour la pédagogie et pour votre patience.
THOMAS B.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Dense
STANLEY J.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Satisfait du contenu même s’il est très dense, à mon avis il faudrait rajouter une journée afin d’approfondir sa compréhension. Formateur très patient qui a su répondre aux questions en y apportant des précisions liées au cours pour que l’on puisse faire le rapprochement
TOM L.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Tres bon support de formation et des exemples tres precis qui font des lien entre la theorie et la pratique.
ANTONIO L.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Difficile dans le temps a dispo de relire tous les Documents reçus, mais c’est une bonne base pour notre prochaines activités dans le monde du travail. Très apprécié et efficace le support et suivi reçu lors des 3 jours de la formation.
MIHEALA D.
24/11/25
5 / 5
très clair et j’ai aimé les schémas=ça aide à comprendre
KEVIN L.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Contenu très complet, mais moins de 3 jours pour tout apprendre et enchaîner direct sur l’évaluation, c’est très court
NICOLAS H.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Contenu de qualité.Intervenant très compétent, à l’écoute et toujours prêt à reformuler et visualiser ou argumenter un sujet si besoin
THEO D.
24/11/25
4 / 5
La formation est très utile et intéressante. Le seul problème c’est l’enchainement formation + examen directement après (le même jour) sans pouvoir retravailler les notion / valider les acquis.3 jours c’est un peu court (un examen le lendemain ou la même semaine aurait été (personnellement) préférable).
SANDRINE F.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Beaucoup de termes, de concept à assimiler en peu de temps. Formatrice un peu sur la réserve au début, mais plus confiante au fil de la formation. Explications claires et formatrice prend le temps de donner les explications nécessaires.
THIBAUT A.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Formation très intéressante et bien présentée, je me sens prêt à obtenir ma certification. Il est cependant dommage de n’avoir eu accès aux supports imprimés qu’à la fin du deuxième jour
SALOMÉ M.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Le contenu était clair et les examples de la formatrice étaient pertinents, merci Pauline pour cette formation !
NATHALIE A.
24/11/25
3 / 5
j’ai beaucoup apprécié Pauline mais seulement 2.5 jours de formation , c’est vraiment impossible à "digérer" pour passer la certification.
IBTISSEM R.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Le contenu était riche et pertinent, et la pédagogie très adaptée. Les explications étaient claires, illustrées par des exemples concrets, ce qui a rendu l’apprentissage agréable et efficace
DAVID F.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Très bon formateur, pédagogue, expérimenté et intéressant à écouter.Ouvert à la discussion, aux questions, prend le temps d’expliquer sans s’appuyer uniquement sur le support de cours.
ALEXANDRE S.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Formation très intense car condensée sur 3 jours, le troisième jour de formation commence à être compliqué en terme d’enregistrement des informations, mais formation néanmoins très
BRYAN G.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Excellent
TOMY T.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Globalement très satisfait.Cependant il y a des erreurs dans le Syllabus ainsi que dans la correction de l’examen blanc A
ANTONELLO N.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Excellente formation.
JEAN DAMIEN P.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Très bien pour la pédagogie et l’implication du formateur. Dommage que la formation soit comprimée sur 3 jours consécutifs. Le plus pénible est le passage de l’examen de certification après la 3eme journée: Fatigue cumulée des 3 jours (notamment du 3eme jour) et temps insuffisant pour comprendre les notions du 3eme jour. L’examen le lendemain serait un plus.
RAFAEL A.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Formateur très a l’écoute qui gère très efficacement l’apprentissage progressif des notions. Excellent gestion des contenus et du timing malgres un programme très dense.
LAURENT N.
24/11/25
5 / 5
La pédagogie est très adaptée au regard du délai donné pour acquérir toutes les notions.
THOMAS S.
24/11/25
5 / 5
C’était dense ! Avoir 3 jours complets de formation et le test le lendemain ne serait pas du luxe. Les 2 dernières demi-journée passent extrêmement vite, pas facile de tout assimiler d’un coup.
MARIE S.
24/11/25
5 / 5
Super support, contenu très interactif. Le formateur est intéressant et s’assure que l’on suit bien.
DAVID V.
24/11/25
3 / 5
formateur de qualité, cependant je trouve le contenu beaucoup trop dense et l’équilibre entre la théorie et la pratique insuffisant. énormément de termes spécifique à la formation, peu de temps pour assimiler les termes puisque l’examen se déroule dans la même journée que la fin du dernier chapitre
BENOIT R.
24/11/25
4 / 5
contenu très dense.Le faite de fournir des exercices ont permis de se familliariser avec l’examen.
GUILLAUME G.
24/11/25
4 / 5
Formateur très patient et pédagogue.Certaines parties très éloignées des usages au sein de l’entrepriseCertains concepts restent abstraits (boîte noire, boîte blanche). Complexité sur les techniques de tests boîte noire / boîte blanche. Enormément de termes et de concepts à appréhender en trop peu de temps. Impression de passer l’exament du code pour le permis de conduire après seulement deux leçons.
MARYAM H.
17/11/25
5 / 5
Very dense but very interesting content. In my opinion, half a day more is needed.
CASTRO DAVID D.
17/11/25
4 / 5
The exercises provided were sometimes already corrected. It was difficult to navigate the whiteboard. The presentation did not necessarily follow the material.
HERVÉ G.
17/11/25
3 / 5
The problem is that the duration of the course is too short for the content and the amount of material to be retained.
HASSAN B.
17/11/25
5 / 5
Super trainer!
YASMINA A.
17/11/25
3 / 5
the teacher gave a quick overview of the technical side of istqb and didn't explain it very well.
PHILIPPE R.
17/11/25
5 / 5
Content too dense for the time available
AFEF S.
12/11/25
4 / 5
Very interesting training, but too condensed, too much information and not enough time to digest it.
FRANCK D.
12/11/25
4 / 5
hard to condense and assimilate all this information in 2.5 days
QUENTIN D.
12/11/25
4 / 5
I find that the training doesn't take up enough time and remembering everything is complicated.
KHEIRA B.
12/11/25
5 / 5
A very educational and dynamic trainer
SYLVAIN B.
12/11/25
4 / 5
Too little time for the content and too compressed (no time to mature the knowledge before the exam).Course summary not yet completed.
FIOTON PASCAL H.
12/11/25
3 / 5
Time too short for theoretical assimilation
QUENTIN S.
22/10/25
5 / 5
We had a very good trainer who was passionate about his job and who was very educational and patient.
ESMAA B.
22/10/25
5 / 5
The training is very intense, and you need to devote a lot of time to revision before taking the exam.
HENRY D.
22/10/25
5 / 5
An excellent trainer! A big well done to José for making the subject lively and easy to digest. He was able to keep me motivated throughout the course, even though I was just starting out in the world of testing. A trainer like him is worth keeping at Orsys for your future learners! The PPT support was top quality and the whiteboard, MCQs and mock exams helped to illustrate the course concretely and to prepare well for the exam! Thanks also to Orsys for the quality of the training!
ALINE D.
22/10/25
4 / 5
content too dense for 3 days!
MAXIME P.
22/10/25
4 / 5
Great trainer, but the distribution of time in relation to the chapters was not optimal. We spent too much time on chapters 1 & 2, which meant we fell behind in the training, which was noticeable on the last day. There weren't enough mock exams and in the few that we did, some questions were repeated.
HAJAR O.
22/10/25
5 / 5
A trainer who takes his time and is very educational.
RUBINTHAN J.
15/10/25
4 / 5
Overall, I'm satisfied with the course, but we should leave 1 or 2 extra days for the exam.
JOAKIM Z.
15/10/25
4 / 5
The pace is badly chopped up. Chapter 1 is shorter than chapters 4 and 5 but has been given as much or more time. It should be shortened to make more room for chapter 4.
KÉVIN M.
15/10/25
4 / 5
Interesting but intense
ESTELLE G.
15/10/25
5 / 5
Time allocated to each subject: in line with the training time (3 days). But seems too short to cover everything.
MALY N.
15/10/25
3 / 5
Much too dense for the 3 days allotted + direct exam afterwards
ARNAUD F.
01/10/25
4 / 5
The content was very good but too fast / too dense, the 3-day course is really too short.
CHRISTOPHER M.
01/10/25
4 / 5
more practical experience would be a plus
VINCENT D.
01/10/25
4 / 5
Fine, but questions that are vicious and/or badly formulated and/or with subjective answers...
LAURIE B.
01/10/25
5 / 5
a trainer who listens and provides additional information
ANTHONY T.
01/10/25
4 / 5
Well done to the trainer!
AUDREY T.
01/10/25
5 / 5
A very comprehensive course that covers the entire ISTQB testing process and prepares you for the Foundation certification exam. The 3 days are very intense, and you need to set aside time before and during the course (in the evening) to integrate the knowledge. The trainer was very interesting and educational, and shared his experiences to illustrate the concepts. The mock exam exercises sometimes give rise to debate about their results, and the course exercises could be improved.
MATHIEU C.
01/10/25
4 / 5
The content was very theoretical and based on learning the themes and definitions, sometimes by heart, and the trainer did his best in 3 days to prepare us.
AURÉLIE B.
01/10/25
4 / 5
I would have liked to have seen many more ISTQB questions
DE SAINT AIGNAN HERVÉ M.
01/10/25
5 / 5
More time to digest the content knowing that there is the certification to follow Having the syllavus available before the course
RENAC BÉATRICE P.
01/10/25
4 / 5
Content too dense to be covered in 2.5 days Very good teaching by the presenter
SOUSA KATHY D.
01/10/25
5 / 5
Very good, but dense in 3 days.
NATHALIE D.
01/10/25
4 / 5
The training is very dense. I would have liked to continue the exercises on the last half-day of theory due to lack of time, which is a pity, as it energises the group and makes it possible to use the course more effectively.
DRISS B.
01/10/25
4 / 5
Very good knowledge of the subject by the speakerLots of sound advice for the final MCQThanks :D
ROMAIN B.
01/10/25
4 / 5
good teaching, but perhaps I would have liked more feedback and explanation of certain concepts
GUILLAUME L.
01/10/25
4 / 5
Perfect teaching content.
RÉMI C.
24/09/25
5 / 5
Highly condensed content in a short space of time
KHALED B.
24/09/25
5 / 5
Overall, I am satisfied with the course, but I think that extending it from 3 to 4 days would be a good idea.
CAROLINE R.
24/09/25
5 / 5
3 days too little time for the density of information + exam, despite the great help of the trainer
GUILLAUME G.
24/09/25
5 / 5
Very dense teaching content over 3 days, 400 pages. I think an extra day for the ISTQB test fundation would be essential.
SANAA A.
24/09/25
4 / 5
The course was very good but there wasn't enough time to take the exam. As the content was very dense, it would have been preferable to have an extra day for the exam. This would also have given us extra time for revision.
LORIANE M.
24/09/25
2 / 5
I'm not satisfied with this course because, although the content is interesting, it's far too dense for the time available. It doesn't give you a chance to take a step back from what you've learned or to fully assimilate the concepts covered. For someone who has never done a test before, the pace is particularly difficult to follow. Despite the trainer's availability and efforts, the load of content remains too heavy for the planned duration.
DA CUNHA CHRISTINE P.
24/09/25
4 / 5
Theoretical and, above all, practical aids much appreciatedTrainer available dynamic patient pleasant teacher
FLAVIEN N.
17/09/25
4 / 5
Very good
YOHANN G.
17/09/25
4 / 5
Very interesting course, although too dense in 3 days of content. A better balance between theory and practice would have been appreciated. Clear explanations.
DOMOINA R.
17/09/25
4 / 5
Interesting and comprehensive training for juniors or those who don't have enough time, but the time allowed for revision is not at all appropriate after 2 and a half days of learning. More time should be allowed to assimilate the concepts. However, the instructor was very clear and present, taking the time to answer every question.
GLORIA M.
17/09/25
4 / 5
3 days is not enough to assimilate everything and pass an exam, you should have had at least 5 days.
NOUR EL HOUDA Z.
17/09/25
3 / 5
The content is interesting, but I found the time was too short to fully assimilate all the concepts. I think it would be useful if the 3rd day were devoted to mock exams or if one or two extra days were set aside for revision, to better prepare participants for the final exam.
VIRGIL G.
03/09/25
3 / 5
As a tester, I didn't learn much. There's no practice (e.g. writing in Gherkin), and the course is dense, with only certification-specific words to remember and their definitions. What's more, with the certification to be passed at the end, there's no time for revision.
ANTOINE B.
03/09/25
5 / 5
Very dense content ^^ 'Trainer teaches well, answers all our questions
MAKOUK LOUMA E.
03/09/25
5 / 5
The content is asset voluminous, it is interesting but needs more time
LESLENE K.
03/09/25
4 / 5
Additional exercise would be more useful to help with more complex points
NICOLAS A.
03/09/25
4 / 5
Content and teaching appreciated. The only downside is the feeling of wasting time at times on principles that are simple to understand and which, in my opinion, could perhaps be skimmed over more quickly in order to dwell on subjects that would be more worthwhile?
CHARLES B.
03/09/25
4 / 5
Unsurprisingly, there was very little time for a very dense course. The basic training was very academic and theoretical, making it difficult to make it fun and practical. Exercises and mock exams very useful for passing the certification. Very comprehensive course materials, exams, etc.
DENIA A.
03/09/25
4 / 5
The trainer was a great listener, available and at the top of his explanations. I really appreciated his teaching style and the way he answered questions, even when time was limited. On the other hand, I didn't really enjoy the pace of the training: a lot of content in a short space of time, which left little time for revision or practical application, especially for me, who has just finished my studies and is starting out as a young Test Analyst.
ELLIOTT B.
03/09/25
5 / 5
Super trainer who was able to make a very complex subject interesting and fun.
FLORENT B.
03/09/25
5 / 5
Thanks Gilles! In 3 days the syllabus has become a comprehensible document.
CERRONE D.
03/09/25
3 / 5
Good teaching, just too much in such a short time, and also lack of diagrams (personal opinion for me because I have a visual memory).
CLAIRE H.
26/08/25
5 / 5
My assessment of this course is not objective as I only took the exam and not the course.
MESTADI ALICE V.
06/08/25
5 / 5
The trainer has a predominant role in this training course, which is very theoretical. Gilles allows us to see in concrete terms how the reference framework can be used in practice in our working environment.
ALEXANDRE P.
06/08/25
4 / 5
Very good trainer, available and precise.
PALUD MARLENE L.
06/08/25
4 / 5
As far as the training itself was concerned, the trainer was good, he was a bit quick on certain ideas/principles, but if we intervened he was happy to come back to them.
SYLVIE P.
06/08/25
4 / 5
The explanations are sometimes a little quick or unclear.
PIERRE B.
23/07/25
4 / 5
- No presentation material - Perhaps half a day more would be appropriate.
ANGELLO F.
23/07/25
4 / 5
have a printout available from the start of the course to record and annotate the content
WALID B.
23/07/25
5 / 5
The training is top quality, but unfortunately we don't have enough time to take the exam. Gille is top notch. Thanks for everything;
MASSINISSA L.
23/07/25
4 / 5
Interesting training, very clear explanation by MR Gilles, nothing to say about the relationship.
YOAN G.
04/07/25
3 / 5
Free candidate, therefore not appreciable.
YOAN G.
04/07/25
3 / 5
Free candidate, therefore not appreciable.
MAGALI B.
02/07/25
5 / 5
I liked the format with exercises spread throughout the course. The summaries at the end of each chapter and the overall assessment at the end are really great. We're also very well prepared for the certification with lots of tips.
JORDANE M.
02/07/25
5 / 5
The trainer was very committed and took the time to explain the different concepts to us. It's a theory-based course that provides a solid grounding in software testing. As the content is very dense, an extra day would have been useful, as well as some time between the end of the course and the certification exam. It was difficult to follow the course and the exam immediately.
LAURA L.
02/07/25
5 / 5
very interesting. the trainer taught very well and made it possible to learn the concepts despite the density of the concepts.
ANDRE AMÉLIA A.
02/07/25
4 / 5
Being distance learning, the exchanges left something to be desired. The course content is very dense and doesn't leave enough time to fully assimilate the concepts covered.
SANDRINE B.
02/07/25
4 / 5
A lot of content to digest in a short space of time! It would be interesting to include time for re-reading the documents, as the evenings are monopolised by revision. The trainer is fascinating and we'd like to have another day to go over some of the less well understood subjects.
LAVALADE ELODIE B.
02/07/25
4 / 5
The course material is of high quality, the examples judicious and the trainer competent and educational. It's a real advantage that the trainer took notes on our progress so that he could answer our questions in a relevant way, based on our experience. The content is dense, and it's a challenge to grasp the concepts as we go along.
ROKHAYA S.
25/06/25
4 / 5
Satisfied
CAROLINE D.
18/06/25
3 / 5
The course content is very theoretical and can quickly become boring if the trainer doesn't provide a minimum of dynamism/humour/life to capture attention (all the more so in a distance learning class!). The course material, handwritten on a whiteboard, is not always legible and contributes to this lack of dynamism. We needed a more fun way of learning.
IRYNA K.
18/06/25
3 / 5
the medium used (a tablet written on by hand) made the explanations difficult to read and use, which hampered understanding. the examples given were often unnecessarily complex. for example, it is possible to find clearer, more structured and accessible resources online, even for people new to the subject.
MAXIME C.
18/06/25
4 / 5
The instructor was available. On the other hand, the content was very dense for a 2 and a half day course. There was a lot of information to digest and the exercises did not cover all the cases.
FLORIAN C.
18/06/25
4 / 5
More than average. Too dense, not enough time, not enough facilitation and involvement from participants.
ADÈLE A.
18/06/25
4 / 5
The content is too dense for the actual duration of 2 and a half daysThe same content should be presented over 4 days instead of 3The pace is too fast
PHILIPPE K.
11/06/25
4 / 5
Ideally, the training should last an extra day (for better preparation) as there is a lot of information to assimilate.
SMIDA JIHEN B.
11/06/25
4 / 5
very short duration for very dense content
DANIEL V.
11/06/25
5 / 5
The content was very dense and difficult to assimilate over 3 days, but the trainer created a good dynamic by focusing on the most important points and giving clear explanations with concrete examples.
YCHÈME Z.
04/06/25
4 / 5
The course is still very dense in 3 days so there are some chapters that are not well seen in detail, the best would be to do the training in 4 or 5 days. the trainer was perfect in his explanations.
FRÉDÉRIC B.
04/06/25
4 / 5
1- Too few practical examples, no examples of documents and their contents at the testware level2- Concerning the level of the training:Not all the vocabulary used in the certification exams was seenToo much to see in too little timeOr raise the level of the prerequisites to benefit from this training course
DOMITILLE L.
04/06/25
4 / 5
Adapting to the needs and questions of those present, taking the time to explain until everyone has understood.
CAMILLE N.
04/06/25
4 / 5
Very good trainer and very good support, but 3 days is a bit too short to assimilate the theoretical elements and vocabulary. There should be more control over the class to avoid students chattering and interfering.
ANTOINE C.
04/06/25
5 / 5
Not enough time to deal with the course content
FRÉDÉRIC M.
04/06/25
3 / 5
Friendly and professional trainerTraining too dense, should be given over one or two more days
ADRIEN R.
04/06/25
5 / 5
CLEAR
MAELYS D.
04/06/25
4 / 5
Interesting training and trainer. Thank you
CHARLÈNE K.
04/06/25
3 / 5
I've changed jobs and I'm starting in this one so I have absolutely no knowledge of vocabulary. The second day has a lot of information, not enough time to explain and understand, and not enough time for revision...
CHRISTELLE F.
04/06/25
5 / 5
Very comprehensive course covering concepts and methodology. Interesting balance over the 3 days, with a more sustained intensity on day 2 and the morning of day 3. A lot of content to learn and ingest, but the trainer brought it to you in a very pedagogical and calming way.
EMILIE G.
04/06/25
4 / 5
A very intense course! The trainer was great, very educational and very available!
MIKAEL P.
04/06/25
4 / 5
A lot to learn in a short space of time. Certification takes place right after the course. No time for revision.
SYLVAIN L.
04/06/25
5 / 5
Very theoretical training that was made lively and enjoyable.
MARION C.
04/06/25
5 / 5
Very good teaching methods.
ALICE C.
04/06/25
5 / 5
Nadia is a highly educational trainer who instils confidence.
FRÉDÉRIC C.
21/05/25
5 / 5
Mr Maier is a very good trainer.
LEA G.
21/05/25
5 / 5
The trainer was very interesting and a good listener. It would have been better to have had some support material before the course (at least 1 or 2 weeks in advance) because the content is quite dense. The time allocated to the first chapters could be shortened to leave more room for the last chapters, which are more technical from my point of view.
VANESSA O.
21/05/25
4 / 5
Too much training in too little time
ABDELKADER B.
21/05/25
4 / 5
a lot to absorb in a short space of timemany trick questionnaires
CHAIMAA N.
21/05/25
4 / 5
As far as I'm concerned, 3 days of intensive training like this isn't enough The first day we started off slowly and then the trainer began to go through the chapters in quick succession What's more, receiving the documentation two days before the training wasn't great.
KINDA S.
21/05/25
4 / 5
Interesting training but too dense for the time available, it was complicated to dwell on certain passages.
JESSICA E.
14/05/25
5 / 5
Very good support and very well animated
MARIE PIERRE H.
14/05/25
4 / 5
Very dense course in 3 days. I would have liked to have had a paper copy of the course in parallel so that I could have added annotations and revised in the evening.
BEATRICE L.
14/05/25
3 / 5
Not enough case studies - I would have liked to have seen more tests based on real-life situations - and not enough practical tools provided.
AUGUSTIN P.
14/05/25
4 / 5
Catherine taught me very well. 3 days is a bit short to cover everything, but the content will be useful in the future.
EDEN K.
14/05/25
4 / 5
There's a lot of information for only 3 days of training, which makes the whole thing rather heavy because we have a schedule to keep to and lots of subjects (over 400 pages of slides). And taking the exam at the end of the 3rd day doesn't give us a chance to review the subjects from the day before the exam.
AZIZA H.
14/05/25
3 / 5
good but too much time spent on the first parts and too little on the rest
MAXENCE S.
14/05/25
3 / 5
The training took too long, so the latest concepts were covered too quickly or not at all. This impaired our ability to revise and prevented us from taking the exam in the best possible conditions.
RAPHAEL D.
14/05/25
5 / 5
The pace was a little slow for my liking, but that can be explained by my experience of self-training. Despite the volume of information to be conveyed, the trainer was very educational and continually friendly.
WALDEMAR Z.
14/05/25
3 / 5
I didn't find it normal not to be able to access the course material during the course.
MARTINE G.
14/05/25
4 / 5
Complex training because it's too dense.great difficulty in assimilating all these new concepts.course too condensedsecond day very difficult.feeling of failure
DELPHINE D.
14/05/25
3 / 5
the training time is too short, and there is not enough exercise for part 4
JEAN O.
14/05/25
4 / 5
The course content is excellent, but the format is very dense given that you only have 3 days to train before taking the certification...
LOUIS P.
23/04/25
4 / 5
Very interesting and rewarding course. However, due to a lack of time, we had to go through certain concepts very quickly without going into any real depth, which made the final evaluation rather difficult on certain questions that were not dealt with very much, if at all. A training course of 3.5 to 4 days would be a big plus.
BAPTISTE D.
23/04/25
4 / 5
The course is very intensive and requires us to work at home in the evenings between sessions to revise or do exercises in order to be ready for the certification exam. It's not always easy to find the time to do this, as the training venue is not in our usual place of work, which can mean fairly long travel times in Ile de France. It would be preferable to have an extra day in the course with the same programme.
NICOLAS S.
02/04/25
4 / 5
a paper course is a necessityTaking the exam just after the end of the course is relatively tiring and restrictive
VANESSA G.
02/04/25
4 / 5
No time to print out a hard copy in the evening after the course and too many pages to print yourself. The presentation should be given on paper at the start of the course, along with the syllabus.
MATHIAS L.
26/03/25
4 / 5
The training is dense and could perhaps benefit from a 4th day in view of the content.
GILLES H.
26/03/25
5 / 5
Good teaching methods, very informative instructor
VICTOR P.
26/03/25
4 / 5
I find it very dense and rather wordy, but it's essential for the foundation, so it makes a lot of sense.
GUILLAUME F.
26/03/25
3 / 5
Too little time to prepare and do the exercises (several hours each day)No revision sheets or assessment diagrams (except 3 hours beforehand) - with the concentration of time this is clearly a plus for being calm for the exam.i would have liked to know that the Syllabus had to be read beforehand (although it was present in the intro)Have more diagrams in the assessments to make them into sheets -> a lot of text (too bad the assessment done on the last day gave them 2 hours before the exam).
ARTHUR D.
26/03/25
4 / 5
Completely satisfied.
FRANÇOIS S.
26/03/25
3 / 5
Good teaching methods, competent and attentive instructor, but too much content in a short space of time.
ADDA GRASSO AURORE A.
19/03/25
3 / 5
In addition, the answers to the questions asked by the students are not always very clear and add confusion to principles that are not always easy to grasp from the outset. The course should be revised so that it is more geared towards exam preparation and half a day should be added to it.
FABIEN F.
19/03/25
5 / 5
Very good trainer. The training was very dynamic and the approach was much appreciated, combining theory and practice. The trainer gave me a better understanding of what was expected before taking the exam. Overall, it was a very good course that gave me a better understanding of the concepts and processes. In my organisation, I'll be better able to carry out my tasks as a tester.
HAIDDI S.
28/02/25
5 / 5
Very dense content, but the trainer was able to emphasise the most important points
LÉO D.
26/02/25
4 / 5
A pleasant course to follow, on the whole mostly theory, which is normal for a review of a reference framework such as the syllabus.
MARTIN S.
26/02/25
5 / 5
Very good quality animation
EMILIE T.
29/01/25
2 / 5
A lot to learn in a short space of time. The mock exam questions show that you have to know by heart the content of the course that you find out in 2 days with trick questions.unclear explanations on certain subjects or even erroneous explanations of exercise answers. Some course explanations are very vague and go in all directions. It's hard to follow.
DJAMILA L.
29/01/25
5 / 5
The trainer was top-notch (listened, made sure the trainees understood the course, was passionate about the subject, etc.) Having said that, and this is not the fault of the trainer, the training time was short for the complexity of the subject.
STÉPHANIE D.
29/01/25
3 / 5
Very dense...
DEN DRIESSCHE LUCAS V.
29/01/25
5 / 5
A little tight on time but quality
FABIO B.
29/01/25
5 / 5
Very calm and precise!
MURIEL B.
22/01/25
5 / 5
Very dense... over 3 daysRequires availability after the training day to review the notes and do the exercises... a 4-day course would lighten the day...
ALEXIS G.
22/01/25
4 / 5
It would appear that this course is expanding year on year, but the duration of the course remains unchanged. We weren't able to do as many mock exams as planned, or even complete all the chapters in the syllabus. Other organisations offer this course over 4 days instead of 3.
MARC B.
22/01/25
5 / 5
The presentation is very comprehensive and gives an overview of all the elements (principles, standards, different professions, roles) of the testing profession, giving us the keys to improve. Thanks to the trainer's skills and his ability to listen to all the chapters, the course was a real success.