At the end of the training, the participant will be able to:
Understand the principle of projects in agile mode and the roles associated with them.
Identify project processes and deliverables under the AgilePM® standard
Use project communication techniques suitable to your audience
Estimate the workload and plan in Agile mode.
Sort and prioritize the requirements of an iteration
Certification
Taking the Agile Project Management (AgilePM®) exam: The exam is made up of 50 multiple-choice questions (1 point per question). The exam lasts 55 minutes, and certification is earned if the candidate gets at least 25 questions correct (50%).
Course schedule
1
Agile methods introduction
The origins, issues and basic rules.
Roles on the Agile project sponsor, Project Leader, Developer, Tester ...
Issues and constraints identification of a project. Configuration management.
Project's success factors and risks.
Hands-on work
Outline of a project. Identify challenges, risks and the best people for each role.
2
AgilePM®: processes and deliverables
Agile Project Management principales. The development framework.
Project initialization. Feasibility. Business Case. The project plan.
Project governance. Risk management. Project launch: the priority requirements (PRK).
Architecture elements (SAD), development and deployment.
Exploration phase: the detailed requirements. Refine solution.
Realisation phase : the Timebox development. Prototype solutions.
Solution deployment . The project review.
Phase after project. Benefits analysis.
Storyboarding workshops
Debate about the processes and deliverables AgilePM®.
3
The communication
The principles key of communication "Atern."
Adapting communication to the nature of the project and the maturity of the team.
The daily meetings (Daily Stand-up meeting).
Team management, stakeholders.
Exercise
Create a project communication plan.
4
Prioritization and definition of an iteration
Sorting requirements. MoSCoW method.
Iteration concept or "Timebox."
Phases of an iteration: to study, refine, consolidate. The objectives and roles.
Continuous monitoring and control of the project and risks.
Exercise
Setting priorities on the requirements.
5
Work estimation and Agile Planning
Good practices estimation practices.
College estimates. Re-estimates.
Good practices for Agile planning.
The different planning levels (delivery plan, deployment ...).
Exercise
Making a delivery plan.
6
AgilePM® Foundation certification exam
Questions and answers.
Review of key points.
Exam presentation and advice.
Exam
AgilePM® Foundation certification exam.
Customer reviews
4,3 / 5
Customer reviews are based on end-of-course evaluations. The score is calculated from all evaluations within the past year. Only reviews with a textual comment are displayed.
GUILLAUME F.
23/09/26
4 / 5
I found the amount of time devoted to each chapter rather unbalanced.
RAPHAELLE B.
23/09/26
4 / 5
The trainer had a very good grasp of the subject matter and knew how to structure each day so that we remained focused on the topic. There was plenty of interaction and time set aside for practical exercises, which I appreciated. The only downside was that many of the terms in the PowerPoint presentation were not clearly defined (as they had a different meaning to that used in everyday language). This led to a misunderstanding of the concepts from the outset and caused some confusion.
SABINE L.
23/09/26
4 / 5
The content could be improved with a better translation and by providing more detail on the concepts mentioned (e.g. SAFe concepts)
NICOLAS D.
23/09/26
5 / 5
An excellent trainer and an excellent training course. Please be aware that the course materials are sometimes poorly translated. This led to some confusion and inaccuracies, which were fortunately clarified by the trainer.
TIPHAINE C.
23/09/26
2 / 5
There was too much variation in ability within the group. We wasted a lot of time explaining concepts that people were supposed to already know. To catch up, we had to skim through certain chapters. What’s more, the trainer kept confusing me with someone else in the group. As a result, I was on the receiving end of comments suggesting that I never took part. One person told another to ‘shut up’, and the trainer n[quo
TCHAA K.
23/09/26
5 / 5
I found the trainer to be competent and qualified. He was very dedicated to the trainees and helped them to fully understand the subject. Thank you very much, Mr CRESSON.
ABDELKADER G.
23/09/26
4 / 5
The course materials need to be improved to include a practical example relating to the AGILEPM concepts
DEHBIA H.
23/09/26
4 / 5
The course material is interesting, but I don’t think it’s suitable for beginners. To take this course, you need to have some knowledge of project management.
TUAN HA ANATOLE H.
10/06/26
4 / 5
Approximate translation
VERRY L.
10/06/26
4 / 5
Hello, The trainer was excellent and of a high standard. However, the supporting materials are not up to scratch, as the translation is rather rough. And sometimes there is no translation at all.
IMANE R.
10/06/26
4 / 5
The support needs reviewing. There are some poor translations. Some paragraphs haven’t been translated.
DAVID B.
10/06/26
5 / 5
Dominique is a brilliant presenter. There have been quite a few issues with the consortium’s support service.
CHAUVOIS AMÉLIE L.
10/06/26
4 / 5
The trainer is very knowledgeable and a good teacher; however, the slides were not always translated from English in the best possible way, which sometimes led to misunderstandings.
BOUARES MYRIAM I.
10/06/26
5 / 5
There are a few issues in the French version, in the translation from English into French
STEFANIA B.
20/05/26
4 / 5
A dense and heavy text; it could be better translated / summarised / updated. Thanks to Marielle, the trainer, for making it easier to understand.
BASTIEN D.
20/05/26
5 / 5
An excellent trainer and teacher
JEAN L.
20/05/26
4 / 5
Lots of theory and slides. A lack of practical activities, and no real-life case studies based on project experience. A few tips and best practices, and some shared personal experiences, but these were rather limited. Otherwise, the session was well run.
LOUISE S.
20/05/26
4 / 5
There aren’t many exercises, and they could do with being more interactive. The course material is quite dense, but the trainer’s delivery is excellent and makes the content easier to take in.
STÉPHANIE V.
22/04/26
5 / 5
The materials translated from English contain a few omissions and some rather unclear translations. The time allocated to each one is too short, but this is in keeping with the duration of the course, which is very intensive. It would benefit from being longer.
ALEXIS M.
22/04/26
4 / 5
It has fulfilled my aim of providing a refresher on the basics for a project manager. It’s a neutral resource that helps you step outside your area of expertise. On the downside, the use of English terms – and even slides that are 100 per cent in English – introduces jargon and makes it harder to understand.
ANNE V.
22/04/26
4 / 5
Dominique, the trainer, is brilliant! He makes sure we understand every step and knows his subject inside out. However, the constant use of ‘Franglish’ in the course materials, the mixing of Scrum and Agile PM terminology, is very confusing, and the slides are disorganised. It’s a bit of a pain… I also find that the certification questions are a far cry from the course material. The certification questions are more philosophical than ‘technical’. Which makes it even more complicated with this co
NATHALIE P.
22/04/26
5 / 5
The training session was very well run. The trainer was effective. Regarding the content: a few adjustments to the wording of the slides would be necessary, as some sentences have not been accurately translated from English. This makes them difficult to understand.
LAURENT R.
11/03/26
5 / 5
Marielle RIBET is an excellent trainer: an expert who knows her subject inside out and delivers it with kindness and a teaching flair
VASSILI O.
08/12/25
4 / 5
Concrete application cases or examples of projects, problems, etc. would have been interesting (e.g. the development of an app for such and such a customer, there was such and such a problem, how it could have been avoided, what role it came from, etc.). Rather than group work, which wasn't very relevant, I found.
MOUNIA Y.
08/12/25
4 / 5
CLEAR
FABRICE R.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Top
GEOFFREY P.
08/12/25
5 / 5
The support perhaps lacks a little detail between what is said orally and what is written on it. This would be to find out the importance of the phases, products and roles, because in the mock exams we see formulations that are not covered on the physical support (useful for re-reading in the evening). Apart from that, if notes are taken during the training it makes up for it.
JOCELYN D.
08/12/25
5 / 5
A lot of practice with a view to certification
FRÉDÉRIC S.
01/12/25
4 / 5
Very good support for revision and exam preparation
AMINE L.
01/12/25
5 / 5
Clear and efficient
KARINE Z.
01/12/25
5 / 5
A very appreciable level of expertise, great availability of the instructor
HAKIM A.
01/12/25
5 / 5
The trainer's approach was very good and enabled us to get to grips with all the training concepts in a very short space of time. The course lived up to my expectations.
SÉVERINE M.
17/11/25
5 / 5
Perfect. lots of top-notch revision
TARIK C.
17/11/25
5 / 5
The trainer is very educational and takes time for his students. Thank you again
ELODIE M.
17/11/25
5 / 5
Super, the trainer is top notch and the content is very clear and complete.
COLINE L.
03/11/25
5 / 5
Very good, interactive ++.
ZINEB S.
03/11/25
5 / 5
Very good training, very available instructor, pedagogue, mastery of the subject. Lots of questions from us but she took the time to answer everything.
TRAINER QUALIFICATIONS
The experts leading the training are specialists in the covered subjects. They have been approved by our instructional teams for both their professional knowledge and their teaching ability, for each course they teach. They have at least five to ten years of experience in their field and hold (or have held) decision-making positions in companies.
ASSESSMENT TERMS
The trainer evaluates each participant’s academic progress throughout the training using multiple choice, scenarios, hands-on work and more.
Participants also complete a placement test before and after the course to measure the skills they’ve developed.
TEACHING AIDS AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES • The main teaching aids and instructional methods used in the training are audiovisual aids, documentation and course material, hands-on application exercises and corrected exercises for practical training courses, case studies and coverage of real cases for training seminars.
• At the end of each course or seminar, ORSYS provides participants with a course evaluation questionnaire that is analysed by our instructional teams.
• A check-in sheet for each half-day of attendance is provided at the end of the training, along with a course completion certificate if the trainee attended the entire session.
TERMS AND DEADLINES
Registration must be completed 24 hours before the start of the training.
ACCESSIBILITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
Do you need special accessibility accommodations? Contact Mrs. Fosse, Disability Manager, at psh-accueil@orsys.fr to review your request and its feasibility.
This programme is an original creation, developed by the teaching teams at ORSYS Formation. Any reproduction, representation, adaptation or use, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorisation of ORSYS, is strictly prohibited. ORSYS reserves the right to take any action necessary to protect its intellectual property rights.
This programme is an original creation, developed by the teaching teams at ORSYS Formation. Any reproduction, representation, adaptation or use, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorisation of ORSYS, is strictly prohibited. ORSYS reserves the right to take any action necessary to protect its intellectual property rights.