Customer reviews are based on end-of-course evaluations. The score is calculated from all evaluations within the past year. Only reviews with a textual comment are displayed. (Translated by Deepl)
ROXANNE S.
15/12/25
3 / 5
Formation dense sur 2 jours, ce qui laisse peu de temps pour approfondir les sujets ou réaliser des exercices pratiques. Un format en 3 jours permettrait d’en tirer davantage de valeur. Le formateur avait parfois une posture dirigiste, avec des réponses assez dures à nos questions. Cela s’est toutefois amélioré le 2e jour, notamment l’après-midi avec plus d’ouverture et de bienveillance dans la posture et les propos.
DAVID N.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Le contenu de la formation ( 300 slides ) en 2 jours est intense mais intéressant.La disponibilité et réactivité du formateur à répondre à nos questions fait la différence.Il a manqué d’interaction avec les participants. Nous avons très peu de retour d’expériences de leur part ce qui est très dommage.Peut-être qu’il aurait fallu les impliquer plus à travers des tours de table ?
CYRIL L.
15/12/25
4 / 5
très riche mais clair et formateur disponible pour préciser
ALAN R.
15/12/25
2 / 5
La formation est désorganisée et ne pose pas les bases de l’attendu. C’est une suite d’informations, mal formalisées et mal expliquées avec parfois des contradictions. Les éléments concrets présentés ne sont pas approfondis. L’animateur ne s’est pas adapté aux personnes présentes et à leurs attentes. Les cas pratiques sont bâclés et la formation est mal rythmée, avec un premier jour léger et un deuxième jour très chargé.
DAVID B.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Formation très intéressante. Merci !
AUDAY A.
15/12/25
2 / 5
Formarion au dessous des attentes. Ça été une salade de mot récité rapidement par un formateur en utilisant des outils comme klaxxon en pensant que ça rend la formation plus interressante ce qui n’été pas le cas
LAURIS A.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Animateur vraiment très bien, ça change de formations avec un animateur qui pêche...Bon équilibre entre théorie et pratique >> top surtout que pas évident à distance
AMAL I.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Contenu qualitatif.
SARAH F.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Très interessant !! Merci beaucoup j’étais en découverte et vraiment c’est beaucoup plus clair
MARION G.
15/12/25
4 / 5
pitié, arrêtez le distanciel, c’est la première formation agile que je fais en distanciel et il est compliqué de rester concentrer, de bypasser les soucis de connexion, retours de pause, soucis techniques. Rien ne vaut un face to face ! C’est une formation trés impacte en trés peu de jours, on parle d’itération en Safe mais là c’est un sprint de sprint !
SOUFYANE R.
15/12/25
4 / 5
2 jours c’est assez court
RENAUD M.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Formation très riche en informations et en concepts. Equilibre respecté entre les différentes parties. Peut mériter quelques exercices pratiques au cours de la séance.
PIERRE-MARC A.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Formateur très à l’écoute, qui maitrise son temps et son contenu. Cours très dense mais très bien expliqué. Christian prend le temps d’expliquer clairement les choses et de bien mettre les choses en contexte.
ELODIE L.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Be
OMOLADE O.
15/12/25
5 / 5
Very interactive
SUZY N.
15/12/25
4 / 5
Partie théorique un peu longue et monotone, peut-être avoir plus d’ateliers en groupe et exercices
ALBA F.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Excellente formation
ROBIN B.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Formation et formatrice de qualité, qui gagnerait peut-être à être exemplifiée, pour certains concepts présentés en particulier
AMIRA A.
08/12/25
4 / 5
très bonne formation avec des petits exercice réguliers pour ne pas rester dans la théorie
JEAN-BAPTISTE G.
08/12/25
5 / 5
Très utile pour quelqu’un comme moi, immergé dans un environnement SAFe, mais plus en tant que spectateur qu’acteur.
GUILLAUME C.
06/10/25
4 / 5
The time between practice and the course: on the first day, we switched back and forth between practice and the course, but the second day was less evenly distributed.
ABDERRAHMANE B.
06/10/25
5 / 5
Very clear
SÉVERINE M.
06/10/25
5 / 5
Super trainer. Content: a little long on the epics, us ... especially when you've already done other training.
MAINAK C.
06/10/25
5 / 5
The training content was comprehensive and well balanced between theory and practice. The materials were relevant and up-to-date, and the trainer made the SAFe concepts accessible through real-life case studies and interactive discussions. The teaching approach encouraged commitment and a progressive understanding of the concepts.
SALMA L.
06/10/25
5 / 5
Very good training. Thank you to the trainer for the quality of the training, his availability and the time he took to answer our questions.
MÉLANIE J.
06/10/25
5 / 5
I found the content of the slides too heavy, with lots of content and text. The quality of the speaker was great, but the content of the slides was too heavy and made it difficult to follow. There was a lack of visuals and succinct content. You don't really know what you need to know for certification.
PASCALE P.
06/10/25
5 / 5
The course content is very clear and well explained. The trainer answers all your questions. The speakers can share their experiences, which is also very interesting.
CANTIE EMMA M.
29/09/25
5 / 5
The course was very interesting and very well run. Access to the training material on the second and last day was a bit of a shame.
D’ASCENSAO INÈS C.
29/09/25
5 / 5
Experienced trainer, who illustrates with experiences or examples, and adapts the pace and exercises of the training to the group.
PATRICE R.
29/09/25
4 / 5
Dense content overall. The audience needs to have already taken part in a project in SaFe mode to avoid being left behind. The exercises provide a better understanding of the various concepts.
KARINE F.
02/06/25
4 / 5
A presentation of the content in English would have been a plus, as the French translations are not intuitive.
YANNICK C.
02/06/25
4 / 5
The trainer is a good teacher, with a good pace which isn't easy to maintain with so many people at a distance, with different levels of knowledge. 2 days of dense training, it would be complicated to follow for someone who has never observed / practised agility at scale. In my opinion, there's less interest in the US / CA writing part, which has often already been seen on Scrum training courses.
GUILLAUME P.
02/06/25
4 / 5
Interesting content, but perhaps a little too much time was spent on the first chapters, which meant that the last chapters, even if they are perhaps less valuable, were nevertheless skimmed through very quickly.
AMINE B.
26/05/25
4 / 5
content a little disjointed. Switching from one medium to another. You get the impression that there's no common thread.
LOUBNA T.
26/05/25
3 / 5
Disappointing training. A whole day on the role of the PO in Scrum, when all the participants were already POs. Little detail on the responsibilities of the PO in SAFe. Too many videos, not enough interaction, and the material was only partially covered. The trainer sometimes lacked clarity and didn't pay enough attention to what was being said. The same was true of the initial training.
BENJAMIN P.
26/05/25
5 / 5
Excellent teacher, full of examples, dense but high-quality content.
HAMZA B.
26/05/25
4 / 5
Satisfied, too bad we didn't go into enough detail about realistic case studies
MARIE B.
26/05/25
3 / 5
the delivery of the training was mixed: the first day was slow, the second was quicker, but I don't feel ready to take the certification exam.
PARMENTIER AURÉLIE D.
26/05/25
3 / 5
Disappointed with the training. One day on the role of the Scrum PO when we were all already POs in the room. No details on the PO's actions in SAFE. Far too many videos (which could/should have been sent outside the course). The support was not followed, it was skimmed over on Tuesday afternoon, stopping at slide 95 out of 173. A concrete case was presented to us on Monday, but was never mentioned again. In the 2 exercises we did, he didn't seem to listen to the res
FRANCK C.
14/04/25
3 / 5
No practical work. 1/3 of the course (until Monday 3.30pm) devoted to the agile manifesto
JEAN-FRANÇOIS M.
14/04/25
2 / 5
Cruel lack of pedagogy, i.e. stating a principle, indicating a context and supporting with a real-life example. Lack of listening to the practitioner errors raised by several participants without clear clarification from the trainer. The main subjects, which correspond to two chapters out of the 7, were rushed through in 1 hour 10 minutes, and even then only because I insisted three times that the important and differentiating subject of this SAFE method be tackled.
LIONEL A.
14/04/25
5 / 5
Rich content, passionate trainer, but not enough time to put it into practice.
GWENAELLE L.
14/04/25
5 / 5
Comprehensive support, trainer who knows how to answer questions using the framework, patient trainer
MAHA H.
14/04/25
3 / 5
There were no practical exercises during the 2 days of training. I understand that there's a lot of information to share, but without practice, the training was monotonous.
JULIEN A.
14/04/25
4 / 5
very dense content for 2 days of training
AXEL V.
14/04/25
4 / 5
The trainer is very good, the only problem being that I was there for a Safe training course and I found that there was a lot of content that didn't correspond to Safe specifically but to agile as a whole (Scrum *too much time* / Backlog management/US creation *too long*). I think spending more time on SAFe and its 'rules'/'practices'/'standards' would be more beneficial/interesting for everyone. But thanks anyway t
JEANETTE NATACHA B.
14/04/25
5 / 5
Thank you for the generosity of the information, even though the course was very dense.
MORGAN C.
07/04/25
3 / 5
orsys should make it compulsory to validate the pre-requisites for people because this training course is dense and requires it, which wastes time on the whole. In addition, the most important subjects have been skimmed over, while time has been wasted on the scrum part.
UGO G.
07/04/25
4 / 5
A lot of content, too much over 2 days, we didn't have time to do any practical work.
ALEXANDRE D.
07/04/25
5 / 5
Very comprehensive content, well structured/balanced, very clear, variety of media
VOARA TAHINA MASINIAINA R.
07/04/25
4 / 5
The time allotted to look at each chapter was badly distributed, which meant that at the end we had to speed up even though the subjects were very interesting and useful.
VALÉRIANE D.
07/04/25
4 / 5
The trainer, the delivery of the training and the training material are all of a high standard. Unfortunately, the time allotted to the various subjects was far too short for me to delve deeper and practise during the session. I would have thought that the approach of the course would have enabled me to be better prepared for certification.
LOTFI M.
07/04/25
5 / 5
The course is very interesting, but it would be beneficial to extend the length of the course and include more definitions and reminders of the basic concepts to ensure complete understanding.
ABELOOS WILLIAM H.
24/02/25
5 / 5
Very good.
LOÏK T.
24/02/25
4 / 5
Prepare examples when the workshops do not allow sufficiently relevant ones to be produced.
NICOLAS P.
24/02/25
5 / 5
perfect! thank you Maita
NADIA A.
24/02/25
4 / 5
Very dense content, it would be better to do the course in 3 days instead of 2.
RÉMY D.
24/02/25
3 / 5
2 days for such a dense training course is impossible. there wasn't enough time for training and practice. the content lacked a chronological vision of safe, regular diagrams of where we are at in a given chapter in relation to the whole of safe etc. The training course was a real success.
2d
- 14h00 
Download in PDF format
Share this course by email